ArticleJMIR infodemiology2026
Online Discussions of Men's Mental Health on Reddit and YouTube: Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Infodemiological Study.
Article in JMIR infodemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMale mental health remains a major global concern, with men underrepresented in mental health care and overrepresented in suicide statistics. Masculine norms that link emotional restraint with strength can discourage help-seeking and vulnerability. Anonymous digital spaces such as Reddit (Reddit Inc) and YouTube (Google LLC) have become informal support environments where men share experiences and emotions outside traditional constraints. Understanding these interactions offers insight into masculine identity and help-seeking behavior.
objectiveThis study examines how men discuss and negotiate mental health within anonymous online communities. It explores whether these spaces support emotional openness, peer validation, and challenges to hegemonic masculinity norms. It triangulates digital discourse with survey and interview data to assess how these patterns align with men's lived experiences and perceived barriers to support.
methodsThis cross-sectional, exploratory mixed methods study analyzed publicly available online discourse from Reddit (n=740 posts) and YouTube (n=6287 comments). The qualitative component included 23 adult men (aged 18-55 years, predominantly Asian and employed) recruited via LinkedIn (Microsoft) who completed an anonymous online survey. Of these, 9 volunteered for follow-up semistructured interviews. Data underwent computational text mining using the Natural Language Toolkit and National Research Council Lexicon for word frequency and emotion analysis, followed by Braun and Clarke's 6-phase reflexive thematic analysis. Online discourse patterns were then compared with survey and interview data. Theoretical frameworks included hegemonic masculinity, toxic positivity, and peer-support theory.
resultsFour themes emerged across the datasets: (1) normalizing emotional expression, (2) mutual validation and peer support, (3) coping through humor and irony, and (4) pushback against toxic positivity and societal norms. Emotion analysis showed prominent expressions of sadness, fear, trust, and anger across the Reddit and YouTube corpus. Survey data showed that 20 of 23 (87%) respondents reported having no safe offline space to discuss mental health. Interview participants (n=9) largely confirmed digital discourse themes, though some divergence emerged regarding whether humor functioned as deflection or connection.
conclusionsThis study combines large-scale analysis of online discourse with qualitative triangulation across Reddit, YouTube, surveys, and interviews. Theoretically, it extends inclusive masculinity theory into anonymous online contexts, showing how digital platforms enable men to negotiate emotional expression outside traditional masculine constraints. It introduces the concept of "digitally mediated sanctuaries" to describe online spaces where men practice vulnerability and mutual support with less social risk. From an infodemiological perspective, the findings show how mental health information and peer-support narratives circulate and gain legitimacy within male-dominated online communities. Findings can inform gender-sensitive digital mental health interventions that build on features men already use, including humor, anonymity, and peer validation. Digital peer environments may complement formal mental health services by reducing help-seeking barriers for men hesitant to access traditional care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.