Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42085685›Full record

ReviewGigaScience2026

Unlocking the potential of Asian genomic data: a collaborative framework for precision medicine innovation.

MedHackathon Asia Community

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in GigaScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

MedHackathon Asia Community

Funding

JICAMinistry of Education of China JYB2025XDXM508National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFC2605400National Natural Science Foundation of China 32030020National Research FoundationNMRCNPMROIS 039RP2024Shanghai Science and Technology Development Foundation 23JS1410100Shanghai Science and Technology Development Foundation 25JS2810100World Health Organization
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asian genomic datasets possess unparalleled potential to advance global understanding of human genetic diversity. Encompassing the world's largest population pool with diverse ethnicities, these datasets capture comprehensive genomic variations shaped by heterogeneous socioeconomic conditions, climate exposures, and clinical environments. However, current national genome initiatives across Asia demonstrate substantial disunity, stemming from limited cross-border communication and collaborative infrastructure, thereby diminishing their collective impact on biomedical research and precision medicine development. The MedHackathon Asia 2025 catalyzed crucial dialogues toward establishing a regional community dedicated to three pillars: harmonized biobank collaboration, standardized genomic data protocols, and cooperative governance frameworks. This multidisciplinary convening brought together researchers, clinicians, bioinformaticians, and national precision medicine program leaders from across Asia to share best practices, identify implementation challenges, and formulate foundational strategies for sustained cooperation. This community review synthesizes critical outcomes from these deliberations, emphasizing the imperative for continuous regional collaboration while advocating for the development of sustainable architectures enabling: (1) equitable biobank resource sharing, (2) genomic data standardization, and (3) ethical governance models. Through consolidation and expansion of this emerging network, Asian nations are expected to lead transformative contributions to global genomic science while ensuring appropriate representation in biomedical innovation. Such coordinated efforts promise to accelerate healthcare advancements with equitable benefits extending throughout the region and worldwide.

Indexed as

Asian PeopleDatabases, GeneticGenome, HumanGenomicsPrecision MedicineAsiaHumansAsian population genomicsBiobankingEthical, legal, and social issuesFederated data analysisInternational data sharingPrecision medicineRegional collaboration

Identifiers

PMID42085685
PMCPMC13196594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.