Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42085671›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2026

Segmentation of Older People's Needs and Readiness for Smart Homes by Residentially Based Lifestyles in Spain: Survey Study.

Jiyeon Yu, Angélica de Antonio, Elena Villalba-Mora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiyeon Yu *Centre for Biomedical Technology, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Parque Científico y Tecnológico de la UPM, Campus de Montegancedo, Crta. M40, Km. 38, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, 28223, Spain, 34 619490028.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6395-3007
Angélica de Antonio *Centre for Biomedical Technology, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Parque Científico y Tecnológico de la UPM, Campus de Montegancedo, Crta. M40, Km. 38, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, 28223, Spain, 34 619490028.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8936-9095
Elena Villalba-Mora *Centre for Biomedical Technology, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Parque Científico y Tecnológico de la UPM, Campus de Montegancedo, Crta. M40, Km. 38, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, 28223, Spain, 34 619490028.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6043-6322

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Globally, the older population is increasing rapidly, becoming one of the most significant demographic trends of the 21st century. This growth poses important social, health, and technological challenges for societies that must adapt their environments and services to promote independent and healthy aging. In Spain, the population aged 65 years and older reached 18% of the total population in 2020, and projections indicate that this proportion will continue to rise in the coming decades. Within this context, smart homes have emerged as one of the most promising avenues to support aging in place and improve the quality of life. Smart homes encompass a wide variety of functions, including environmental control, safety monitoring, communication, and other assistive technologies, that may help older people stay healthy, safe, and independent in their own homes. However, older people are not a homogeneous group. Their lifestyles, health conditions, and technological experiences differ substantially, which means that, as with any assistive technology, smart home functions must match the real and perceived needs of the target users to ensure acceptance, adoption, and long-term use. Objective: In this study, as a step forward toward the adaptability of smart home technology, we present a method to analyze the practical needs of smart home functions for older people. Specifically, we aim to understand the Spanish older population's readiness and needs for smart homes and to provide insights that can guide the design of more adaptive and user-centered solutions. Methods: We conducted an online survey focusing on residentially based lifestyles, health conditions, and preferences for smart home functions, targeting older adults living in Spain. The survey collected information about participants' demographic profiles, daily activities, health self-assessment, and attitudes toward technology. A total of 102 valid responses were analyzed. We then classified the older adults according to their residentially based lifestyles using clustering techniques and analyzed the preferences and needs for smart home functions in each identified group. Results: Four clusters emerged based on the information provided by the participants: (1) high quality of life and independent life, (2) poor quality of life, (3) social-centered life, and (4) creative and personal-centered hobbies at home. On the basis of this classification, we explored each group's specific needs for smart homes and estimated their readiness to embrace different aspects of technology. As a result, the top-priority smart home functions for each group were identified and compared. Conclusions: This research contributes to understanding the practical user needs of smart homes as assistive technologies for older people. It provides a methodological approach to anticipate and prioritize functions according to user characteristics, supporting the development of personalized, adaptive, and more acceptable smart home solutions for aging populations.

Indexed as

Independent LivingLife StyleAgedAged, 80 and overAging in PlaceFemaleHumansMaleQuality of LifeSelf-Help DevicesSpainSurveys and Questionnairesassistive technologyolder peopleresidentially based lifestylessmart homesuser needsuser segmentation

Identifiers

PMID42085671
PMCPMC13143161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.