Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42085670›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

Effect of Wearable Activity Tracker Social Behaviors on Physical Activity and Exercise Self-Efficacy: Real-World Pilot Study.

Amanda Bireline, Derek J Hevel, Paul G Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amanda BirelineDepartment of Health & Exercise Science, Mercy University, 555 Broadway, Dobbs Ferry, NY, 10522, United States, 1 914-323-2322.ORCID 0009-0007-6375-9531
Derek J HevelDepartment of Kinesiology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7703-3690
Paul G DavisDepartment of Kinesiology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7117-2000

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Wearable activity trackers are useful tools to track and monitor physical activity (PA), especially considering their use in free-living environments. Users often see moderate improvements in step count, but consistent increases at various intensities of PA are inconclusive. While wearable research is growing, no known studies specifically examine the relationship between how the use of self-selected social features on wearables affects PA and exercise self-efficacy. Objective: This study aims to compare weekly PA, approximating moderate-to-vigorous intensity, of adults from the New York City metropolitan area assigned to either use or not use social engagement PA features on their device. Exercise self-efficacy was also measured. Additionally, a preliminary examination into the use of 3 different social features was conducted to inform where controlled parameters on feature use may be needed in future work. Methods: The researchers conducted a real-world pilot study by recruiting wearable users aged 18 years and older in the New York City area to wear their devices in free-living environments. After consent, participants were randomized into 1 of 2 conditions: the condition that involved use of the social engagement PA features or the condition that did not for 8 weeks. Participants submitted objective data from their device and completed a self-efficacy measure at baseline, week 4, and week 8. Those in the intervention group also answered questions about which social feature they used the most throughout the study. Results: Data from 123 participants were analyzed using mixed methods analysis. Principal findings included no difference between wearable social feature users and nonusers in weekly PA (P=.55) or exercise self-efficacy (P=.47). There was an overall effect of time across the repeated measures on PA (P=.006) with an average increase of 72 (SD 3) minutes. Secondary findings highlight the need to control for the use of only a single social feature to identify more concrete effects. An effect of time was found across the repeated measures (P=.01) in the intervention group, showing an increase of 49 to 126 minutes of PA, depending on the feature used most. The mixed methods analysis also found that exercise self-efficacy did not significantly change based on which social feature was used most (P=.24). Conclusions: Consistent with other literature, this pilot study demonstrates that using wearables can lead to increases in PA and that sharing one's PA data with others may amplify the effect. However, the novelty of this study is that although carefully implied, specific social features on a wearable may have a greater effect than others. This study identified the need for further investigation into which features may be more effective. With the increased prevalence of device ownership, knowing if certain social features lead to greater increases in PA may help those encouraging PA behavior change.

Indexed as

ExerciseFitness TrackersSelf EfficacySocial BehaviorWearable Electronic DevicesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew York CityPilot Projectsbehavior changefitness trackershealth behaviorphysical activityself-efficacysocial engagementwearable activity trackerswearable devices

Identifiers

PMID42085670
PMCPMC13143198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.