Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42085652›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2026

Early Detection Intervals for Evaluating Event-Based Surveillance System: Reference Dataset Development Study.

Yannan Shen, Philip AbdelMalik, Russell J Steele, David L Buckeridge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yannan ShenDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Suite 1200, 2001 McGill College Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3A 1G1, Canada, 1 514-396-1153.ORCID 0000-0002-3389-4157
Philip AbdelMalikDepartment of Pandemic and Epidemic Intelligence Systems, World Health Organization, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7984-2088
Russell J SteeleDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1071-0914
David L BuckeridgeDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Suite 1200, 2001 McGill College Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3A 1G1, Canada, 1 514-396-1153.ORCID 0000-0003-1817-5047

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early detection of health threats is an objective of public health surveillance, and event-based surveillance (EBS) using unstructured information from diverse sources has played an increasingly important role in achieving this objective. However, the evaluation of EBS systems has been hindered by the lack of reference data on outbreak onsets. Objective: We introduce the concept of an "early detection interval" and create a dataset of these intervals across multiple countries for the epidemic caused by the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2. Methods: We defined the early detection interval as the time between the date of introduction of an infectious agent to a country and the date at which an increase is detectable in traditional public health surveillance data. To determine the date of the introduction of the Omicron variant, we analyzed phylogenetic studies and genome databases. We estimated the end of the interval by applying Bayesian online change point detection to reported COVID-19 case counts. In addition to the early detection intervals, this dataset also contains variables indicating data quality. To further understand the variation in the lengths of the early detection intervals, stratified analysis and univariate Cox proportional hazards were implemented. Results: This dataset contains early detection intervals for the Omicron variant in 117 countries. The intervals have a median length of 28 (IQR 18-44) days, with a median beginning date of November 27, 2021 (IQR November 17, 2021, to December 12, 2021), and a median ending date of January 2, 2022 (IQR December 19, 2021, to January 9, 2022). Countries with high sequencing availability tend to have earlier start dates with a maximum difference across data sources of only 15 (IQR 7-39) days and consequently a prolonged interval length with a median length of 29 (20-47) days. Countries with low incomes were underrepresented in this dataset, with only 12 (29.27%) out of 41 included, and they tended to have shorter intervals with a median duration of 16 (IQR 12-23) days. The univariate Cox proportional hazards ratio regression analysis confirmed prolonged interval length in countries with high sequencing availability (hazard ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.38-0.92) and shortened interval length in low-income countries (hazard ratio 2.37, 95% CI 1.29-4.36). Conclusions: The dataset of early detection intervals created in this study can serve as reference data and facilitate the evaluation of the timeliness of alerts generated by EBS systems. Systematic and comprehensive evaluation of EBS is important to guide the development of EBS and motivate the integration of EBS into public health practice. Our study also highlights cross-country disparities in data quality, particularly for genomic evidence, and the need for data collection and sharing focused on low-resource settings.

Indexed as

COVID-19Public Health SurveillanceHumansSARS-CoV-2Time FactorsCOVID-19data qualitydatasetdetectionevaluationevent-based surveillanceinfectious disease outbreakpublic health surveillanceSARS-CoV-2surveillance

Identifiers

PMID42085652
PMCPMC13143157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.