Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42085471›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Synthetic data enables human-grade microtubule analysis with foundation models for segmentation.

Mario Koddenbrock, Justus Westerhoff, Dominik Fachet, Simone Reber, Felix A Gers, Erik Rodner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mario KoddenbrockKI Werkstatt, Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Berlin (HTW), Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3327-7404
Justus WesterhoffBerliner Hochschule für Technik (BHT), Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0077-8333
Dominik FachetMax Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Berlin,‌‌ Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4321-9304
Simone ReberBerliner Hochschule für Technik (BHT), Berlin, Germany.
Felix A GersBerliner Hochschule für Technik (BHT), Berlin, Germany.
Erik RodnerKI Werkstatt, Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Berlin (HTW), Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying microtubules (MTs) and their mechanical properties is central to understanding intracellular transport, cell division, and drug action. While important, experts still need to spend many hours manually segmenting these filamentous structures. The suitability of state-of-the-art methods for this task cannot be systematically assessed, as large-scale labeled datasets are missing. We address this gap by introducing the synthetic dataset SynthMT, produced by tuning a novel image generation pipeline on real-world interference reflection microscopy (IRM) frames of in vitro reconstituted MTs without requiring human annotations. In our benchmark, we evaluate nine fully automated methods for MT analysis in both zero- and Hyperparameter Optimization (HPO)-based few-shot settings. Across both settings, classical algorithms and current foundation models still struggle to achieve the accuracy required for biological downstream analysis on in vitro MT IRM images that humans perceive as visually simple. However, a notable exception is the recently introduced SAM3 model. After HPO on only ten random SynthMT images, its text-prompted version SAM3Text achieves near-perfect and in some cases super-human performance on unseen, real data. This indicates that fully automated MT segmentation has become feasible when method configuration is effectively guided by synthetic data. To enable progress, we publicly release the dataset, the generation pipeline, and the evaluation framework.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMicrotubulesAlgorithmsComputational BiologyHumansMicroscopy

Identifiers

PMID42085471
PMCPMC13167036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.