Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42085469›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

Early identification of high-risk individuals for mortality after lung transplantation: A retrospective cohort study with topological feature engineering.

Alexy Tran-Dinh, Enora Atchade, Sébastien Tanaka, Brice Lortat-Jacob, Yves Castier, Hervé Mal, Jonathan Messika, Pierre Mordant, Philippe Montravers, Ian Morilla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alexy Tran-DinhUniversité Paris Cité, AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard, Département d'anesthésie-Réanimation, INSERM, Paris, France.
Enora AtchadeUniversité Paris Cité, AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard, Département d'anesthésie-Réanimation, INSERM, Paris, France.
Sébastien TanakaUniversité Paris Cité, AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard, Département d'anesthésie-Réanimation, INSERM, Paris, France.
Brice Lortat-JacobUniversité Paris Cité, AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard, Département d'anesthésie-Réanimation, INSERM, Paris, France.
Yves CastierUniversité Paris Cité, AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard, Département de chirurgie thoracique et vasculaire, Paris, France.
Hervé MalUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm U1152, Paris, France.
Jonathan MessikaUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm U1152, Paris, France.
Pierre MordantUniversité Paris Cité, AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard, Département de chirurgie thoracique et vasculaire, Paris, France.
Philippe MontraversUniversité Paris Cité, AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard, Département d'anesthésie-Réanimation, INSERM, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3422-5705
Ian MorillaUniversité Sorbonne Paris Nord, LAGA, CNRS, UMR, Laboratoire d'excellence Infibrex, Villetaneuse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5100-5990

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung transplantation remains the only definitive treatment for end-stage respiratory failure; however, it has substantial post-operative mortality risk. Current methods like the Lung Transplant Risk Index offer limited predictive performance. This study introduces a novel topological feature engineering model to assess mortality risk. The objective is to improve predictive accuracy by capturing complex temporal patterns while ensuring interpretability. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using clinical data from lung transplant recipients. The model integrates static and time-dependent variables through topological feature extraction, enabling sequential risk updating at transplantation, ICU admission, and throughout early post-operative course. Performance was compared to established methods using a held-out test set. Metrics included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC. Interpretability was assessed using Shapley Additive explanations. The proposed model demonstrated superior predictive performance compared to traditional clinical risk scores (LTRI, CCI) and standard machine learning models. On the test dataset, it achieved 87.4% accuracy, 84.1% sensitivity, and 89.6% specificity, with an absolute AUC gain of 0.08 over the best non-topological baseline (p < 0.001). The model consistently outperformed existing approaches across subgroups including age, underlying disease, and transplant type. Shapley analysis revealed that dynamic variables such as early post-operative oxygenation trends, immunosuppressive load, and inflammatory markers were among the most critical contributors to mortality risk. The integration of topological features significantly enhances prediction of post-transplant mortality risk. These findings highlight topological transformers as a valuable tool for precision medicine and clinical decision support.

Identifiers

PMID42085469
PMCPMC13143088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.