Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42085444›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

The effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for fatigue in people living with chronic kidney disease: A protocol for a systematic review.

Hannah Mary Louise Young, Lisa Ancliffe, Ffion Curtis, Oluwafemi Efuntoye, Matthew Pm Graham-Brown, Selina Lock, Kathrine Parker, Chris Rolfe, Ellesha Smith, Aniebiot-Abasi Udofia and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Hannah Mary Louise YoungNIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester and University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4249-9060
Lisa AncliffeDepartment of Therapy, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Ffion CurtisLiverpool Reviews & Implementation Group (LRiG), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Oluwafemi EfuntoyeDepartment of Renal Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7751-9092
Matthew Pm Graham-BrownDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Selina LockLibrary and Learning Services, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1090-1529
Kathrine ParkerDepartment of Renal medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Chris RolfePatient and Public Representative and Chairman Exeter & District Kidney Patients Association, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Ellesha SmithDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Aniebiot-Abasi UdofiaDepartment of Nephrology, University Hospital of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom.
James O BurtonNIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester and University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
Caroline BoothDepartment of Nephrology, Evelina London Children's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Ishida YukoDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS, United Kingdom.
Daniel Scott MarchDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects approximately 850 million people worldwide and is associated with a substantial and growing symptom burden. Fatigue is one of the most common and debilitating symptoms across all stages of CKD, with prevalence far exceeding that of the general population. It profoundly affects quality of life, daily functioning, and clinical outcomes, underscoring the need to identify and evaluate effective pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies for its management. This protocol outlines methods for a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and perceived effectiveness of interventions for fatigue in people with CKD. We will include randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled trials, before-and-after studies, and qualitative evaluations in adults and children with any stage of CKD. Searches will be conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, PsycINFO, and ClinicalTrials.gov, alongside grey literature via Google Scholar. No language or publication date restrictions will be applied. Study selection will follow a two-stage screening process, with two reviewers independently assessing titles/abstracts and then full texts using predefined eligibility criteria. Data will be extracted using a standardised form, capturing study characteristics, interventions, and outcomes. Risk of bias will be assessed with the NIH Study Quality Assessment Tools or the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. Results will be synthesised narratively, and, where appropriate, pooled using meta-analysis. Certainty of the evidence for the primary outcome will be assessed using the GRADE approach and presented in a Summary of Findings table. This review will provide a comprehensive synthesis of evidence on interventions for fatigue in CKD, highlight gaps to guide future research, and inform the UK Kidney Association Symptom Guidelines.

Indexed as

FatigueRenal Insufficiency, ChronicHumansQuality of LifeResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID42085444
PMCPMC13143074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.