ArticlePloS one2026
Technological impact, generality, and complementarity of artificial intelligence patents: Evidence from Samsung Electronics.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the extent to which artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are more pervasive and technologically complementary than non-AI technologies. Drawing on the literature on general purpose technologies (GPTs), we hypothesize that AI technologies exhibit greater pervasiveness-reflected in higher technological impact and broader generality-and stronger technological complementarity than non-AI patents. Using a firm-level analysis of patents filed by Samsung Electronics between 1982 and 2018, we find that AI patents demonstrate significantly higher impact, wider generality, and stronger systematic complementarity compared to matched non-AI patents. These results are robust across alternative matching specifications and multiple operationalizations of the key variables. Our findings offer firm-level empirical supporting AI's GPT-like characteristics and shed light on how AI-driven innovations may generate sustained incentives for technological advancement, even amid processes of creative destruction. The paper concludes by discussing key theoretical, managerial, and policy implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.