Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42085384›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Data fusion-based traffic prediction and software decision support for recreational suburban roads.

Shahriar Afandizadeh, Saeid Abdolahi, Hamid Mirzahossein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shahriar AfandizadehSchool of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5137-3673
Saeid AbdolahiSchool of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Hamid MirzahosseinDepartment of Civil - Transportation Planning, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1615-9553

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting traffic flow on mountainous suburban roads is challenging due to highly variable environmental, temporal, and traffic-related conditions. This study focuses on Kandovan Road, a critical route with complex behavioral patterns influenced by weather conditions, calendar events, and road-specific characteristics. To improve forecasting accuracy, eight machine learning and deep learning models were implemented, including Deep LSTM, Random Forest Regressor, XGBRegressor, Transformer, ST-ResNet, Conv-LSTM, Bidirectional LSTM, and LSTM-GAN. The models were trained and evaluated using traffic, weather, and event datasets from 2017 to 2023, with performance measured through MAE, RMSE, MSE, and MAPE metrics. Among the evaluated models, the Random Forest Regressor achieved the highest accuracy with an R² score of 0.88 and a low average error. This result demonstrates its strong ability to model non-linear and dynamic traffic patterns. The results indicate that integrating diverse data sources significantly enhances traffic prediction performance on mountain roads. Additionally, a dedicated traffic forecasting software system was developed to visualize real-time predictions and provide an operational decision-support tool for traffic authorities. The outcomes of this work support more efficient traffic management, improved road safety, and sustainable transportation planning in challenging terrains.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesSoftwareForecastingHumansLong Short Term MemoryMachine LearningPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestTransportationWeather

Identifiers

PMID42085384
PMCPMC13143125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.