Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42085334›Full record

ArticleFolia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP)2026

Development and Initial Validation of Phonation Quotient for Connected Speech: A Low-Cost, Indirect Aerodynamic Measure of Phonatory Airflow.

James A Curtis, Leyla E Jimenez, Isabel M Aberin-Angulo, Ariana Seidman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James A CurtisAerodigestive Innovations Research Lab (AIR), Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA, yrj9003@med.cornell.edu.
Leyla E JimenezAerodigestive Innovations Research Lab (AIR), Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA.
Isabel M Aberin-AnguloAerodigestive Innovations Research Lab (AIR), Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA.
Ariana SeidmanSean Parker Institute for the Voice, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe phonation quotient derived from a sustained vowel (PQ-SV) is a valid, low-cost estimate of phonatory airflow but may not reflect the aerodynamic demands of connected speech. This study introduces the phonation quotient for connected speech (PQ-CS), a novel extension of PQ-SV, and evaluates its initial validity by examining (1) the relationship between PQ-CS and directly measured airflow during connected speech; (2) physiologic relationships among PQ-CS component measures; and (3) whether PQ-CS or PQ-SV demonstrates stronger associations with airflow across connected speech and sustained vowel tasks.

methodsThirty adults without structural laryngeal pathology completed vital capacity maneuvers; comfortably spoken and maximum phonation of a sustained vowel (/a/); and comfortably spoken and maximum phonation of continuously repeated productions of the voiced sentence "We were away a year ago." Time, volume, and airflow were measured using the Phonatory Aerodynamic System. PQ-CS and PQ-SV were calculated as vital capacity divided by maximum phonation time for the connected speech and sustained vowel tasks, respectively. Associations were evaluated using simple linear regression and Pearson correlation coefficients.

resultsPQ-CS demonstrated significant positive associations with mean flow rate during both the maximum phonation connected speech task (r = 0.57) and the comfortably spoken connected speech task (r = 0.41). PQ-CS component measures exhibited expected physiologic relationships, including strong associations between vital capacity and phonation volume (r = 0.62) and a negative association between task duration and mean flow rate (r = -0.37). Across connected speech tasks, PQ-CS showed stronger associations with airflow than PQ-SV. In contrast, PQ-SV demonstrated the strongest association with airflow during maximum sustained vowel phonation, whereas PQ-CS showed a stronger association during comfortably sustained vowel production.

conclusionPQ-CS is a valid, physiologically grounded, and clinically feasible indirect measure of phonatory airflow during connected speech. Together, PQ-CS and PQ-SV provide complementary aerodynamic information that may enhance clinical voice assessment when specialized equipment is unavailable.

Indexed as

AerodynamicsAirflowConnected speechPhonation quotientVoice assessment

Identifiers

PMID42085334
PMCPMC13331465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.