ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026
MBMA Bridging Models as a Tool for Exploration of Clinical Endpoints in Unstudied Indications.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current State-of-the-Art and Future Advancements of Model-Based Meta-Analysis.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
- MBMA Bridging Models as a Tool for Exploration of Clinical Endpoints in Unstudied Indications.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) offers a powerful framework for quantitatively integrating clinical trial data to inform drug development and decision-making. In this study, a novel quantitative modeling approach using MBMA was proposed to project key efficacies of treatment in future Phase 2 or Phase 3 studies for an untested indication. As a case example, aggregate level data from a total of 67 published randomized-controlled clinical trials were analyzed to build dose-response and longitudinal models, enabling us to bridge efficacy endpoints across psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), two related conditions within the psoriatic disease spectrum. The models incorporated both placebo and treatment effects while accounting for trial-level heterogeneity, such as differences in study phase and population. Specifically, modeling has been done in two steps: (1) bridging across PsO and PsA indications and (2) bridging across endpoints within the PsA indication. Multiple model evaluations and assessments including external validation, by leaving one study out, were conducted to ensure robustness and confirm the predictive accuracy of the framework. Outcomes supported the potential of the proposed approach not only to characterize treatment effects across diseases but also to support evidence-based decisions on trial design for the new indication. This approach holds strong promises for accelerating development timelines and improving success rates in drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.