ArticleAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2026
Effects of China's Clean Heating Policy on respiratory symptoms and airway inflammation in adults: a quasi-experimental study in rural Beijing.
Article in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleNorthern China's Clean Heating Policy (CHP) aimed to reduce wintertime coal burning in rural homes by restricting coal use and providing subsidies for clean heating. The policy's health impacts on respiratory outcomes have not been empirically evaluated.
objectivesTo estimate the impact of the CHP on respiratory symptoms and airway inflammation using a difference-in-differences design leveraging the policy's staggered rollout across rural Beijing villages.
methodsWe enrolled 1003 adults aged ≥40 years from 50 rural villages reliant on coal heating at baseline (2018-2019). Over 4 winters (2018-2022), 20 villages were enrolled in the CHP. During up to 3 winter waves of data collection, we measured respiratory symptoms by questionnaire and, in a subsample, measured fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). We estimated the policy's effects using extended 2-way fixed effects models, accounting for village-level clustering and potential time-varying confounders. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsExposure to the CHP was associated with a 7.5 percentage point reduction (95% confidence interval (CI): -12.8, -2.3) in the prevalence of any respiratory symptom, primarily driven by reductions in reported difficulty breathing (-3.3 pp, 95% CI: -8.0, 1.3), shortness of breath (-3.5 pp, 95% CI: -9.3, 2.3), and cough (-2.8 pp, 95% CI: -7.3, 1.6). We observed no evidence of an effect of the CHP on FeNO (0.3 ppb, 95% CI: -2.2, 2.8).
conclusionsThe CHP led to reductions in reported respiratory symptoms among Beijing adults. This study contributes to the limited empirical evidence that clean energy policies can yield health benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.