Observational studyJCI insight2026
Detection of cytokine release syndrome using wearables and cytokine profiling following CAR-T therapy for myeloma.
Observational study in JCI insight, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUNDChimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies have revolutionized treatment for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, cytokine release syndrome (CRS), a common and potentially severe complication, requires inpatient monitoring, limiting access and increasing costs. Wearable devices could support outpatient CAR-T delivery, but feasibility for CRS detection versus standard care remains unproven.METHODSWe conducted a prospective, single-center observational pilot study to assess the feasibility of using wearable devices for monitoring vital signs and detecting CRS. Thirty patients receiving idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) or ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) were enrolled; 25 with sufficient monitoring data were evaluable. Sensors collected skin and axillary temperature, oxygen saturation, respiratory and heart rate, and motion. Peripheral blood cytokines were analyzed pre- and postinfusion using a multiplex proteomic platform. The primary outcome was feasibility, assessed by CRS detection sensitivity and specificity; secondary outcomes included adherence, lead time, and performance of models integrating wearable and cytokine data.RESULTSCRS occurred in 20 of 25 patients. The best-performing wearable model detected 18 or 20 CRS episodes with a sensitivity of 0.72 (mean 0.75; 95% CI 0.60-0.91) and a specificity of 0.80 (mean 0.76; 95% CI 0.68-0.84), and a median lead time of 7:00 hours before nursing recognition. Median adherence during high-risk periods was 71%. Cytokine changes paralleled temperature elevations, and IFN-γ emerged as a consistent biomarker.CONCLUSIONWearable devices are feasible for early CRS detection and may support outpatient CAR-T care. Larger outpatient studies are warranted.TRIAL REGISTRATIONThis study did not meet the criteria for ClinicalTrials.gov registration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.