ArticleAsian journal of andrology2026
Fresh or frozen testicular sperm? Guidance from an etiology-classified retrospective study on ICSI cycles for patients with azoospermia.
Article in Asian journal of andrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using testicular sperm, men with azoospermia can father children. Sperm cryopreservation helps avoid the risk of cycle canceling because of the failure of testicular sperm retrieval. However, cryopreservation of testicular sperm can potentially impair sperm function. In addition, the different qualities of testicular sperm retrieved from men with various etiologies of azoospermia can lead to different intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes after sperm cryopreservation. A retrospective analysis was performed to elucidate the influence of frozen testicular sperm from men with different etiologies of azoospermia on assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment outcomes. Testicular sperm retrieval rates were also compared. The fertilization rate was found to be influenced by testicular sperm cryopreservation in most cases, especially for patients with azoospermia factor c (AZFc) deletion, and embryo development was significantly impeded when frozen testicular sperm from Klinefelter syndrome (KS) patients were used. Moreover, ART treatment outcomes after embryo transfer were not significantly influenced by testicular sperm cryopreservation for any of the etiologies. In addition, significantly higher sperm retrieval rates were achieved in cryptorchidism, KS, and AZFc deletion patients, whereas the testicular sperm retrieval rate was significantly lower in patients with idiopathic nonobstructive azoospermia. Collectively, our findings suggest that except for patients with KS, testicular sperm retrieval prior to initiating ovarian stimulation of the patient's partner should be considered the first-line approach. In addition, assisted oocyte activation should be performed in ICSI cycles using frozen testicular sperm, especially for patients with AZFc deletion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.