Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42084805›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026

Advancing Wider Implementation of Multi-regional Clinical Trials in East Asia.

John H Skerritt, Irene Chan, Aloka Chakravarty

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John H SkerrittFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia. john.skerritt@unimelb.edu.au.
Irene ChanEli Lilly and Co, 306 East Merrill St, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.
Aloka ChakravartyEli Lilly and Co, 306 East Merrill St, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ICH E17 guideline is intended to promote the effective and efficient use of multi-regional clinical trials in simultaneous global medicines development, contributing to faster patient access. However, its uptake has been slower than hoped, and some regulators often require local (national) clinical trial data for regulatory submissions. This review examines the extent of ethnic (country of origin) influences on pharmacokinetic (PK) or pharmacodynamic (PD) profile of drugs, with a focus on East Asian countries. We conclude that clinically significant ethnic differences are likely to be less common for many newer therapeutics than older drugs, especially those older small-molecule drugs with low therapeutic indices. Major source of ethnic differences in drug PK or PD are due to differences in the allelic frequencies of particular genes for metabolizing enzymes and other drug targets or receptors, respectively. The default approach for conducting clinical trials for products intended for global markets should be to assess safety and efficacy through multi-regional clinical trials and requirements for country-specific enrolment in trials infrequently justifiable only on scientific grounds.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicAsia, EasternEast Asian PeopleHumansClinical trialEthnic differencesICH E17Patient accessRegulation

Identifiers

PMID42084805
PMCPMC13354707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.