ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Population-Based First Estimates of the Effect of HPV Vaccination in Three Italian Areas Covered by Organised Cervical Screening.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In Italy, the first women invited for HPV vaccination at 15-16 years reached the age for cervical screening (25 years) in 2018. The real-world vaccination impact was evaluated. Women born in 1993-1996 invited for organised cervical screening in three Italian areas in 2018-2022 were eligible. After informed consent, they were tested for high-risk HPV and genotyped. Positives, triaged by cytology, were immediately referred to colposcopy if ASCUS+ (irrespective of genotyping); otherwise, recalled for cytology after 3 years. We estimated the relative (vaccinated with ≥ 2 doses vs. unvaccinated women) infection prevalence of three groups of genotypes: HPV16/18, HPV31/33/45 and HPV 35, 39, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68 ('non-vaccine preventable') and the relative positive predictive value (PPV) for histology-based CIN2+ detected at immediate colposcopy. Of 14,346 enrolled women, 34% had no vaccination, 66% ≥ 2 doses. The relative infection prevalence was 0.05 (0.03-0.10) for HPV16/18 without non-vaccine genotypes, 1.36 (1.23-1.50) for non-vaccine genotypes without HPV16/18 infections and 0.06 (0.03-0.12) for co-infections by both groups. The relative PPV for CIN2+ was very high (4.09; 1.40-12.01) in vaccinated women co-infected by HPV16/18 and non-vaccine types (4/9 vs. 7/84 cases) but reduced to zero in case of stand-alone HPV16/18 infections (0/12 vs. 15/117 cases). The CIN2+ relative detection in women infected only by non-vaccine types was 1.57 (0.87-2.82). The increase in infections and high-grade CIN from the pool of all non-vaccine genotypes requires further research (including pooling of data) to be confirmed with longer follow-up and on a larger study population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.