ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
An interview-based qualitative study of scalp cooling, alopecia, and disparities in Black breast cancer patients.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExisting quality-of-life assessment tools for chemotherapy-induced alopecia may not adequately serve women of all races. Non-White patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy at our institution were approximately six times less likely than White patients to use scalp cooling (SC).
objectiveThis study examines factors contributing to this disparity through interviews with Black women undergoing chemotherapy, focusing on alopecia's impact and attitudes toward its prevention and treatment.
methodsSemi-structured, 1-hour Zoom interviews were conducted and transcribed. Content analysis using NVIVO software and a grounded theory approach identified themes.
resultsThree main domains emerged: (1) alopecia's impact, (2) barriers to SC, and (3) improving alopecia management. Key barriers included limited representation of Black women in SC advertising and concerns about SC's effectiveness on textured hair. Solutions included better counseling on SC use, camouflage options, and increased awareness of other treatment options like dermatology referrals. LIMITATIONS: The study was conducted at a single institution; participation was voluntary leading to possible selection bias and the risk for recall bias in the setting of assessing patients' attitudes retrospectively.
conclusionThis study highlights barriers to SC use among Black women, providing insights for developing interventions to improve access to alopecia prevention and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.