ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
High-precision label-free virtual H&E staining of 3D holotomography using DAPI-guided conditional diffusion learning.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeConventional hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining is destructive and largely limited to two-dimensional sections. We aimed to develop a practical virtual staining method that produces H&E-like images from label-free three-dimensional holotomography (HT) while preserving nuclear morphology and requiring only HT at inference.
methodsWe designed a DAPI-guided conditional diffusion model with a shared encoder and two decoder heads (H&E and DAPI). During training, the model receives HT as condition input and predicts diffusion noise for both H&E and DAPI targets using mean-squared-error objectives. DAPI is used only during training as nucleus-centric guidance. Data were acquired from the same tissue using a sequential protocol (HT imaging, then DAPI imaging, then H&E imaging). Because local nonlinear tissue deformation remains after global affine registration, HT-H&E pairs were treated as weakly paired, while HT-DAPI provided stronger local correspondence.
resultsCompared with CycleGAN baselines, the proposed model produced more realistic nuclear morphology and better structural consistency. On held-out test tiles, DAPI-guided diffusion achieved lower FID and KID (FID: 9.2158; KID:
conclusionsTraining-only DAPI guidance improves virtual H&E generation from label-free HT without requiring DAPI during inference. This weakly paired training design reduces dependence on expensive pixel-level registration and supports scalable, nondestructive digital histopathology workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42084770What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.