Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42084762›Full record

ArticleBrain informatics2026

Benchmarking resting state fMRI connectivity pipelines for classification: robust accuracy despite processing variability in cross-site eye state prediction.

Tatiana Medvedeva, Irina Knyazeva, Ruslan Masharipov, Alexander Korotkov, Denis Cherednichenko, Maxim Kireev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tatiana MedvedevaN. P. Bechtereva Institute of the Human Brain, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia. tanai2010@mail.ru.
Irina KnyazevaN. P. Bechtereva Institute of the Human Brain, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Ruslan MasharipovN. P. Bechtereva Institute of the Human Brain, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Alexander KorotkovN. P. Bechtereva Institute of the Human Brain, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Denis CherednichenkoN. P. Bechtereva Institute of the Human Brain, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Maxim KireevN. P. Bechtereva Institute of the Human Brain, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid evolution of machine learning (ML) methods has yielded promising results in human brain neuroscience. However, the reproducibility of ML applications in neuroimaging remains limited, challenging the generalizability of inferences to broader populations. In addition to the inherent variability of the brain activity (both in healthy and pathological states), poor reproducibility is further enhanced by inconsistencies in data preprocessing techniques and methods for calculating functional connectivity (FC), which are used as parameters for brain state classification. To systematically assess the impact of abovementioned factors on ML applications to fMRI data, we benchmarked a comprehensive set of FC analysis pipelines for the classification task between fMRI data recorded in two fundamentally different states: eyes open and eyes closed. In contrast to studies involving heterogeneous clinical populations or using complex cognitive tasks, our controlled experimental design - based on two independent datasets of healthy participants collected in different laboratories - minimizes variability related to a task design or pathological brain states. Classification accuracy and reproducibility were compared for 256 distinct FC analysis pipelines, covering common preprocessing approaches, brain parcellation schemes, and connectivity metrics. Notably, we employed two ways of validation: a direct cross-site validation strategy - when a model was trained on one site and tested on another, and few-shot domain adaptation - when a few samples of testing site were added to the train set. Despite the substantial variability in pipeline configurations, we observed consistently high classification accuracy (~ 90%), confirming that FC-based models can robustly discriminate between well-defined brain states (eye conditions) across different acquisition sites. Best results both in terms of classification accuracy and stability were observed using Pearson correlation and tangent space parametrization as FC, Brainnetome as atlas, and confound regression strategies based on the CompCor method. These findings highlight the resilience of rs-fMRI FC-derived characteristics to methodological variation and support their utility in the discovery of biomarkers, particularly in settings that involve stable and reproducible brain states.

Indexed as

DenoisingfMRIFunctional connectivityMachine learningResting state

Identifiers

PMID42084762
PMCPMC13197499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.