ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2026
Regional Variation in Management Strategies for Occupational Low Back Pain in Australia.
Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeLittle is known about transitions in physical therapy and pharmaceutical pain management among workers' compensation (WC) claims with lower back pain (LBP). This study examined these transitions within Victoria's WC system-one of 11 in Australia-to better understand treatment pathways and potential geographic variation.
methodsTreatment transitions were analysed using Markov transition matrixes based on 32,132 accepted LBP claims with two years of medicine and service data from the Victorian WC scheme (01/01/2010-31/12/2017; data censored 31/12/2019). Transitions were assessed within 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post claim. Geographic location was coded as major city/inner regional vs. outer regional/remote.
resultsPhysical therapy was initiated earliest (median: 77 days post claim; interquartile range [IQR]: 19-217). Opioids and other medications followed, with median initiation at 162 (IQR: 36-412) and 157 (IQR: 77-407) days, respectively. During the acute period, an 11.8% lower proportion of workers from outer regional/remote areas received physical therapies compared to those from major cities/inner regional areas, this gap remained consistent throughout the entire follow-up period. They also showed slightly higher probabilities of receiving only pharmaceutical treatment, particularly during the sub-acute and persistent periods.
conclusionThe findings reveal geographic disparities in recommended treatment guidelines. Opioids were more likely used as first-line treatments for WC claims in outer regional/remote areas, while physical therapy was favoured in major cities/inner regional areas. Further research should explore whether accessibility contributes to these disparities. Understanding such disparities is essential for informing targeted interventions, clinician education, and resource distribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42084752What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.