ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Combining generative large language models and pretrained language models for predicting acute respiratory distress syndrome progression.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition in which early diagnosis and timely intervention are crucial. Recent research into machine learning for predicting ARDS progression based on objective clinical data has been hindered by the limited availability of high-quality annotated datasets. Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) have shown promising results in various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, especially in unstructured electronic health records, but their application to numerical clinical data has been constrained by data type limitations. This study investigates the feasibility of combining generative Large Language Models (LLMs) with PLMs for predicting ARDS progression. The proposed method leverages LLMs to convert numerical clinical indicators into clinical narratives, followed by classification using PLMs to predict ARDS progression. The proposed method was evaluated using two prominent public ICU databases (eICU and MIMIC-IV) and a real-world dataset from the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. Validation results indicate that our method surpasses traditional approaches, yielding F1-scores of 0.8128, 0.9333, and 0.8462, respectively. These results show that generative LLMs and PLMs can improve early ARDS prediction and clinical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42084722What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.