ReviewInfectious diseases and therapy2026
Adult RSV Vaccination: What Is the Role of RSV Subgroup in Disease Prevention?
Review in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Response Letter to the Editor Regarding "Adult RSV Vaccination: What Is the Role of RSV Subgroup in Disease Prevention?"Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Article
- Letter to the Editor Regarding "Adult RSV Vaccination: What is the Role of RSV Subgroup in Disease Prevention?"Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) cocirculates as two antigenic subgroups, RSV A and RSV B, with irregular dominance by season. Despite highly conserved fusion (F) protein epitopes, sequence, and antigenic differences between A and B, especially within prefusion F, can modulate neutralization and susceptibility. First-in-class adult RSV vaccines licensed in 2023 adopt two antigen strategies: monovalent stabilized prefusion F based on sequences from the RSV A subgroup, and bivalent stabilized prefusion F antigens from both RSV A and RSV B subgroups to decrease reliance on RSV A cross-protection. Clinical data from bivalent vaccine studies support high efficacy against disease from both subgroups, while monovalent vaccine studies suggest that RSV B cross-protection may wane more quickly. Emerging and continued real-world vaccine effectiveness monitoring of both monovalent and bivalent RSV vaccines will be needed to assess this early signal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.