ArticleAnimal cognition2026
Numerical competence in peafowl: small quantity discrimination.
Article in Animal cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to discriminate numbers is widespread across taxonomically diverse animals. Some animals may have evolved enhanced numerical abilities to cope with specific social or ecological challenges. Peafowl (Pavo cristatus) are one example in which enhanced numerical abilities could be useful because peacocks have colorful trains that exhibit many eyespot feathers and females may evaluate the number of eyespot feathers to assess their mates. We therefore tested the numerical discrimination abilities of captive peafowl using a custom touchscreen apparatus. Peafowl were presented with two squares that contained a different number of circles (one to eight) and they received a reward for pecking on the square that contained more circles. To examine whether quantity factors aside from numerosity were influencing their performance, we varied the size, density or surface area of the circles. We found that the peafowl's performance was largely driven by numerosity rather than the other quantity factors. The peafowl generally performed at levels above chance regardless of the size, density or surface area of the circles. Their performance was also consistent with the Weber-Fechner Law, in which numerical discrimination is related to the ratio between numbers rather than the absolute difference. The results suggest that peafowl can discriminate among numbers and they could potentially use that ability during courtship or other contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.