ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Differential changes in the effective neural drive following new motor skill acquisition between vastus lateralis and medialis.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate whether short-term acquisition of a new motor task is mediated by changes in common synaptic inputs to motor neurons within and between synergistic muscles.
methodsTwenty one participants performed 15 repetitions of a complex force-matching task at 10% of maximal voluntary contraction. Two trials were selected for analysis, the one with the highest force-target error (pre-learning) and the one with the lowest (post-learning). High-density surface electromyograms recorded from vastus medialis (VM) and vastus lateralis (VL) were decomposed into motor unit spike trains, and units were tracked between trials. Motor unit discharge behavior and common synaptic oscillations across the delta, alpha, and beta bands were calculated and compared between pre- and post-learning.
resultsForce-target matching improved across trials, accompanied by a significant decrease in discharge rate variability in VL (p < 0.001), while the mean discharge rate remained similar (p > 0.14). The area under the curve in delta band coherence decreased for VM (p = 0.01), VL (p < 0.001) and VM-VL motor units (p < 0.001). In contrast, alpha band decreased for VL (p < 0.001), but not for VM (p = 0.41). Notably, reductions in alpha band correlated significantly with performance improvements only in VL (R = 0.77) but not VM.
conclusionThe acquisition of a new motor task is mediated by modulations in common synaptic inputs to motor units, leading to improved force control. Our findings suggest muscle-specific associations between these changes in common synaptic inputs and short-term motor learning, particularly in the alpha band.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.