Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42084517›Full record

ArticlePediatric pulmonology2026

Considerations for the Role and Implementation of Reproductive Health Shared Decision-Making Interventions for Cystic Fibrosis: A Qualitative Investigation of Perspectives From Clinicians and Females With Cystic Fibrosis.

Sarah Brown, Denitza Williams, Jamie Duckers, Traci M Kazmerski, Olivia M Stransky, Caitlin Mason, Alexis Bennett, Jennifer Ward, David Taylor-Robinson, Oluwaseun B Esan and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric pulmonology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sarah BrownSchool of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.
Denitza WilliamsDivision of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Jamie DuckersAll Wales Adult CF Centre, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Traci M KazmerskiDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA.
Olivia M StranskyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2274-0005
Caitlin MasonSchool of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.
Alexis BennettSchool of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6176-2573
Jennifer WardSchool of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.
David Taylor-RobinsonDepartment of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Oluwaseun B EsanDepartment of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7903-8770
Shantini ParanjothyAberdeen Centre for Health Data Science, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Daniela SchlüeterDepartment of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Rhiannon PhillipsSchool of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.

Funding

Health and Care Research Wales Research for Public and Patient Benefit RfPPB-18-1497T
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdvances in cystic fibrosis (CF) treatment have seen more people with CF starting a family. Females with CF (FwCF) have expressed a need for improved reproductive health-related shared decision-making (SDM) with health care providers. This study explored perspectives of FwCF and clinicians on the role and implementation of SDM tools in CF reproductive health care.

methodsWe conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with FwCF and clinicians. We recruited clinicians through professional networks and FwCF via a previous study and social media. Interviews explored experiences of SDM related to reproductive health. Participants were given examples of SDM tools and asked to consider their utility within CF care. We analyzed interview transcripts using an inductive approach, identifying key themes.

resultsSix FwCF and 23 clinicians participated. Four themes were identified: Perceived usefulness of an SDM approach for CF reproductive health, Role of tools in facilitating SDM, Considerations for SDM tool development, and Implementation of SDM in routine CF care. Participants saw information provision as key to SDM, enhancing patient confidence to initiate and engage in conversations. Participants considered SDM tools helpful at three stages: preparing for consultations, facilitating in-consultation communication, and supporting post-consultation reflection and discussion. Trustworthy content was key to engagement. Participants felt reproductive health conversations should start in adolescence and recur throughout the life course. Clinicians highlighted the need for a service-wide culture supporting SDM.

conclusionsBoth groups supported early and ongoing reproductive health-related SDM. Further research should evaluate CF-specific reproductive health SDM interventions that build confidence, skills, and foster a health-service culture supportive of SDM.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCystic FibrosisDecision Making, SharedPatient ParticipationReproductive HealthAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsQualitative Researchcystic fibrosisdecision aidsimplementationqualitativereproductive healthshared decision‐making

Identifiers

PMID42084517
PMCPMC13142212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.