Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42084460›Full record

ArticleGenetics and molecular biology2026

Population epigenetics: Historical notes and applications in human health.

Sergio Russo Matioli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics and molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sergio Russo MatioliUniversidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Biociências, Departamento de Genética e Biologia Evolutiva, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2070-2061

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key factor contributing to the success of Darwin and Wallace's theory of biological evolution by natural selection was its population-level perspective. This conceptual framework was not immediately adopted, largely due to the enduring intuitive appeal of Lamarckian ideas. The development of genetics during the twentieth century provided compelling evidence that effectively excluded Lamarckian mechanisms from the mainstream understanding of evolutionary processes. Some naturalists, however, proposed mechanisms by which environmental factors could influence genotypes in shaping phenotypes, later attributed to chemical modifications of DNA or chromosomal proteins, among others. The field of population epigenetics emerged with the aim of extending the well-established discipline of population genetics by incorporating such phenomena. This review seeks to provide a historical background on this subject and to examine how advances in both contemporary epigenetics and population epigenetics have been achieved, as well as their implications for the study of human diseases, particularly regarding their contribution to the phenomenon of missing heritability. Because there are major taxonomic differences in the transgenerational inheritance of epigenetic modifications, the potential effects of epigenetic architecture on phenotypes of interest also differ, as in the case of mammals and, in particular, humans.

Identifiers

PMID42084460
PMCPMC13141671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.