ArticleGenetics and molecular biology2026
Population epigenetics: Historical notes and applications in human health.
Article in Genetics and molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A key factor contributing to the success of Darwin and Wallace's theory of biological evolution by natural selection was its population-level perspective. This conceptual framework was not immediately adopted, largely due to the enduring intuitive appeal of Lamarckian ideas. The development of genetics during the twentieth century provided compelling evidence that effectively excluded Lamarckian mechanisms from the mainstream understanding of evolutionary processes. Some naturalists, however, proposed mechanisms by which environmental factors could influence genotypes in shaping phenotypes, later attributed to chemical modifications of DNA or chromosomal proteins, among others. The field of population epigenetics emerged with the aim of extending the well-established discipline of population genetics by incorporating such phenomena. This review seeks to provide a historical background on this subject and to examine how advances in both contemporary epigenetics and population epigenetics have been achieved, as well as their implications for the study of human diseases, particularly regarding their contribution to the phenomenon of missing heritability. Because there are major taxonomic differences in the transgenerational inheritance of epigenetic modifications, the potential effects of epigenetic architecture on phenotypes of interest also differ, as in the case of mammals and, in particular, humans.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.