Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42084339›Full record

Observational studyUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2026

Ultrasonographic evaluation of tendon injuries in hand trauma: a crucial tool for emergency care.

Güner Yurtsever, Hüseyin Acar, Ejder Saylav Bora, Cüneyt Arıkan

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Güner YurtseverDepartment of Emergency Medicine, İzmir Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir-Türkiye.
Hüseyin AcarDepartment of Emergency Medicine, İzmir Katip Celebi University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir-Türkiye.
Ejder Saylav BoraDepartment of Emergency Medicine, İzmir Katip Celebi University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir-Türkiye.
Cüneyt ArıkanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir-Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHand injuries, particularly tendon injuries, are a common reason for emergency department visits and may significantly impact daily functioning. Traditional diagnostic approaches may fail to detect partial tendon injuries, highlighting the need for alternative imaging techniques. Ultrasonography (USG) has emerged as a rapid, non-invasive, and effective diagnostic tool for tendon injuries, particularly in emergency settings where magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may not be readily available. This study evaluates the diagnostic effectiveness of ultrasonography in assessing tendon injuries among patients presenting with hand trauma in the emergency department (ED). Ultrasonography findings were compared with clinical evaluations to determine its role in diagnosing tendon injuries and guiding surgical management. This prospective observational study was conducted in the ED of a single tertiary-care hospital over a one-year period and included adult patients presenting with hand injuries.

methodsPatients who met the inclusion criteria underwent both clinical evaluation and ultrasonographic examination. A total of 68 patients were included in the study. All assessments were performed by an experienced emergency medicine physician using a Philips Affinity S70 ultrasonography system (Philips Healthcare, Bothell, WA, USA). Collected data included patient demographics, injury characteristics, ultrasonographic findings, and the need for surgical intervention. Statistical analyses were performed using the chi-square test and binary logistic regression to compare the diagnostic performance of the two methods.

resultsUltrasonography demonstrated a sensitivity of 82.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-0.91), specificity of 90.9% (95% CI: 0.70-0.98), and an overall accuracy of 85.3% (95% CI: 0.75-0.92) in predicting the need for tendon repair. Clinical evaluation showed slightly lower diagnostic performance, with a sensitivity of 80.4% (95% CI: 0.67-0.89) and an accuracy of 80.9% (95% CI: 0.70-0.89).

conclusionRegression analysis indicated that ultrasonography increased the likelihood of accurately diagnosing tendon injuries by 21.8 times compared to clinical assessment. Together, clinical evaluation and ultrasonography predicted 61% of all cases requiring tendon repair.

Indexed as

Hand InjuriesTendon InjuriesAdultEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesUltrasonographyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42084339
PMCPMC13168738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.