ArticleBiochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Enhancing Biochemistry Education for Medical Students Through Game-Based Learning: Students' Perception and Performance.
Article in Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Game-based learning (GBL) has emerged as a promising approach to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes in various educational domains. This study aimed to assess the effect of applying GBL to biochemistry teaching on medical students' learning outcomes and performance, and to explore the students' perceptions and satisfaction. This study sought to determine whether embedding GBL in a second-year medical biochemistry module improves students' perceptions, engagement, and academic performance compared with traditional interactive teaching alone. A mixed research design was employed. A retrospective cohort design to assess and compare the results of achievement for the cohort of 2023/2024, which was instructed using GBL together with traditional interactive learning (exposed group), and the cohort of 2022/2023, which adopts traditional interactive pedagogy with the same learning outcomes, instructor, and question difficulty level) (the unexposed group) using the validated Measurement of Actual Knowledge and Engagement (MAKE) tool. Using GBL was positively received by most students. Simplification of biochemistry content (69.8%), led to students expressing interest in demonstrating their understanding (75.5%), engaging with biochemistry concepts (76.4%), and being stimulated to focus on the subject (83.5%). The results point toward the potential of GBL to improve learning outcomes with notable increases in skills and knowledge (70.2%), active participation (69.6%), and the application of concepts (65.5%). Integrating structured GBL activities into biochemistry teaching fostered higher student motivation and engagement and was associated with improved perceived learning and stable examination scores. Further controlled studies are warranted to elucidate causal links and long-term knowledge retention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.