ArticleThe South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings2026
Noise exposure burden and hearing protection compliance among Saudi military personnel: A cross-sectional study.
Article in The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNoise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) results from prolonged or intense exposure to loud sounds, causing permanent auditory damage often accompanied by tinnitus, reduced hearing sensitivity and difficulty understanding speech. Use of appropriate hearing protection is essential to minimizing exposure, preventing cochlear injury and reducing the long-term impact of NIHL.
objectivesThis study aimed to assess noise exposure experiences, their effects on hearing sensitivity and the use of hearing protection among Saudi military personnel.
methodsThis cross-sectional study used a self-administered Arabic questionnaire developed after a literature review and consultation with a focus group. Copies were distributed to military personnel visiting the audiology clinic at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh from 2024 to 2025 and shared via social media nationwide. The questionnaire included 14 items across three sections: demographics, experience with noise exposure and hearing protection and awareness of noise-related impacts.
resultsA total of 256 participants completed the questionnaire; the majority were male (97.3%), lived in Riyadh (85.2%), and were aged 31 years-40 years with a high school education. Most reported no hearing loss across years of experience and exposure to loud sound sources. Notably, 130 participants (50.8%) did not use hearing protection despite being aware that loud noise can cause hearing loss and tinnitus (p = 0.01). Significant associations were found between reported hearing loss and involvement in shooting or use of weapons (p = 0.01) as well as noise source types (p = 0.02).
conclusionAlthough most participants were aware of the harmful effects of loud noise and related symptoms, only one-third consistently used hearing protection. Training to enhance awareness of NIHL risks, along with periodic hearing assessments for early detection, is recommended.Contribution: This study highlights a gap between awareness of noise-induced hearing loss and the use of hearing protection among Saudi military personnel. It identifies weapon-related noise exposure as associated with reported hearing loss, emphasizing the need for targeted hearing conservation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.