ArticleThe South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings2026
Decolonising audiology education: Epistemic barriers and opportunities for Black African students.
Article in The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn South Africa, the Audiology curriculum remains rooted in Eurocentric epistemologies that do not reflect the lived realities, languages and cultural knowledge systems of Black African First-Language Speaking (BAFLS) students. This study responds to national calls for epistemic transformation in health sciences education, including Audiology.
objectivesThis study examined the epistemological challenges encountered by BAFLS Audiology students at the University of Interest (UoI). Our objectives were to explore how the BAFLS students experience accessing and navigating the undergraduate Audiology curriculum and recommend interventions to address the identified challenges.
methodA qualitative hermeneutic phenomenological design informed the methods adopted. Ten purposively selected BAFLS graduates from the UoI participated in in-depth semi-structured interviews. Cowen's Logical Model of Curriculum Development (LMCD) framed the data generation and analysis. A decolonial perspective emerged naturally in the interpretation of the findings, based on the experiences reported, which the authors incorporated into the discussion of the recommendations for improvements.
resultsThematic analysis revealed a lack of alignment between some of the curriculum content taught and the realities of Audiology practice in African contexts. Assessment practices were experienced as biased and failing to account for the students' linguistic and cultural diversity. Experienced linguicism, racism and classism contributed to surface learning and graduates feeling underprepared to provide contextually relevant and Afrocentric professional care.
conclusionThe undergraduate Audiology curriculum at the UoI needs a fundamentally transformative redesign towards being more Afrocentric and epistemologically inclusive towards BAFLS students.Contribution: This study provides a pathway towards the decolonisation of the Audiology curriculum by identifying specific challenges to be addressed urgently to improve its epistemic inclusivity towards BAFLS students, who currently feel marginalised.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.