ArticleCurationis2026
Factors influencing the competence of student midwives in symphysis-fundal height measurement: A quantitative study.
Article in Curationis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGiven the central role of antenatal competencies in midwifery practice and the critical importance of accurate symphysis-fundal height (SFH) measurement for monitoring foetal growth, it is essential to explore the factors that influence student midwives' competence and confidence in performing this key clinical skill. Evidence showed inconsistency in SFH measurement among the midwives.
objectivesThis study aimed to investigate factors influencing student midwives' competence and confidence in the measurement, plotting and interpretation of SFH in selected public health institutions in KwaZulu-Natal.
methodA quantitative, descriptive cross-sectional design was employed. A convenience sampling technique was used to select participants. Data were collected from 184 student midwives of 250 student midwives using a structured questionnaire, yielding a response rate of 73.6%.
resultsThe study identified several factors influencing competence and confidence in SFH measurement, plotting and interpretation, including regular communication (74.4%), constructive feedback from clinical lecturers (76.1%), student-preceptor relationships (64.9%), role modelling (78.2%) and the overall learning environment (69.2%).
conclusionAlthough many students reported receiving constructive feedback and positive role modelling, variability across units underscored the need for a more structured and standardised approach to clinical teaching and mentorship. Strengthening the clinical learning environment is essential to complement existing teaching strategies and ensure consistent, high-quality preparation of midwives.Contribution: The findings will guide curriculum developers to consider SFH skills as stand-alone procedures, so students can practise them and become competent at the point of registration as a midwife.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.