ArticleAfrican journal of primary health care & family medicine2026
Obstetricians' perceptions of midwife specialists' roles in South Africa.
Article in African journal of primary health care & family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe midwife specialists (MS) are trained midwifery professionals with advanced knowledge and skills to perform interventions to respond to complicated maternal and neonatal conditions. A midwife specialist is expected to function independently and interdependently with other healthcare professionals such as obstetricians and paediatricians. However, studies have shown that the circumstances within public hospitals could be more favourable to the midwife specialist's independent and autonomous practice.
aimThis study aims to explore and describe obstetricians' perceptions of midwife specialists' roles in public hospitals in South Africa.
settingThe study was conducted in the selected public hospitals in South Africa.
methodsAuthors followed a qualitative, descriptive, explorative research design. Data collection took place between March 2022 and June 2022. Purposive sampling was utilised to sample nine obstetricians to participate in online individual semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using Colaizzi's seven-step method.
resultsThree themes emerged. In theme 1, midwife specialists are skilled professionals practicing with limitations. In theme 2, there is an absence of the specific scope of practice (SOP) for midwife specialists'. In theme 3, they are defensive practitioners with over-reliance on physicians and clinical records.
conclusionThe SOP should be revised to grant midwife specialists full professional and legal authority to practice independently. Removing these limitations would enable them to collaborate effectively with physicians, ensuring safe and comprehensive maternal and neonatal care.Contribution: This study highlights the state of midwife specialists practice in the public hospitals of South Africa. Obstetricians elucidate various barriers to midwife specialists autonomous and collaborative midwifery care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.