ArticleFaraday discussions2026
Disentangling multistep kinetics by combining electrochemical Arrhenius analysis with micro-kinetic modelling.
Article in Faraday discussions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Interplay between Interfacial Solvation and Surface Kinetics Tunes the Selectivity between Hydrogen Evolution and Zinc Electrodeposition.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- The role of interfacial excess charge in the reversibility of proton and hydroxide solvation in electrocatalysis and bipolar membranes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrocatalytic reactions often involve several steps and intermediates, along with changes in the catalyst structure and chemistry under reaction conditions, making their mechanistic understanding very challenging. As a way to extract maximum information about the kinetics, temperature-dependent electrochemistry enables access to the apparent activation energy and pre-exponential factor as a function of the electrochemical bias. Recently, many reactions were shown to exhibit rich structures in their bias-dependent activation parameters, structures which cannot be accounted for by the traditional, single-step Butler-Volmer theory. Here, we study the overpotential-dependent activation parameters of a 2-step microkinetic model featuring an electrochemical adsorption followed by a chemical recombination step. We show that the electrochemical bias drives transitions across several kinetic regimes where the degree of rate control of each step varies. A key finding is that the bias dependent Arrhenius signatures constrain the underlying phase space of intermediate binding and activation enthalpies, even for such a seemingly simple model. From the close fit of our model with our experiments on the oxygen reduction reaction, we find that for a wide overpotential range, one kinetically relevant intermediate - and thus two partially rate determining steps - are controlling the kinetics on platinum and ruthenium nanoparticles. From the fits, we extract the corresponding binding and activation energies along with bias-dependent coverage. We argue that combining temperature dependent electrochemistry with minimalistic micro-kinetic models allows a direct comparison with DFT calculations and
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.