ArticleBiology open2026
Computer vision analysis to identify episodic flapping in hovering hummingbirds.
Article in Biology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hummingbirds hover, enabling them to serve as exclusive pollinators for many plant groups with which they have coevolved. They combine bird muscle power with insect flight skills to hover and maneuver in any direction. This study investigates an under-explored aspect of their hovering flight: many species exhibit an alternative gait, in which they flap their wings discontinuously, including momentary pauses sporadically interspersed between short series of wingbeats, which collectively generate a pattern we denote as 'intermittent hovering'. These brief pauses have not been characterized in hummingbirds but may play aerodynamic, energetic, and/or signaling roles. To detect and measure intermittent hovering, we present a high-throughput method to quantify these irregular wingbeat pauses using computer vision and signal analysis. High-speed videos of 11 species collected by recording free-living hummingbirds allowed us to track and analyze the pauses during hovering. The proposed algorithm has a precision of 74%, accurately detecting flapping pauses and thus intermittent hovering. Most of the misclassification errors were false positives: when very still hovering hummingbirds were continuously moving their wings, but some of the consecutive frames were similar enough that the algorithm classified them as a brief pause. These false positives, however, are easily discarded upon quick visual inspection, and the algorithm had only 19 false negatives across all videos, actually detecting intermittent hovering if it was present. This method is a step forward in creating tools that help researchers analyze complex behavioral patterns. Our study confirms the feasibility of reliably detecting intermittent hovering, contributing to our understanding of hummingbird flight dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.