ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
Reducing Elective Surgery Backlogs Through Centralized Waiting List Management: A Quality Improvement Study.
Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionGrowing elective surgical waiting lists remain a persistent global challenge, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, which led to the widespread suspension of non-urgent procedures. In the Gulf region, elective surgery cancellation rates reached up to 72% by 2020, compounding surgical backlogs. At Salmaniya Medical Complex, Bahrain's largest public tertiary hospital, the resulting backlog overwhelmed existing systems that relied on fragmented spreadsheets and manual logs. This Quality Improvement Project (QIP) aimed to improve surgical waiting list management using a centralized, data-driven approach to reduce backlog, improve scheduling, and enhance theatre utilization.MethodsThis retrospective pre-post QIP included all adult patients (≥18 years) listed for elective, non-cancer surgery across secondary and tertiary surgical specialties between January 2019 and December 2023. Interventions, implemented from January to August 2024, included: (1) consolidating all waiting list data into a single computerized system; (2) validating and updating entries through direct patient contact; and (3) integrating a centralized repository within the Electronic Patient Record (EPR) system. This enabled real-time tracking, automated prioritization, and flexible scheduling. The primary outcome was waiting list volume. Secondary outcomes were mean waiting time to surgery and theatre utilization. Descriptive statistics and paired t-tests were applied to assess the significance of any differences observed with a significance of p<0.05.ResultsFrom January to August 2024, the surgical waiting list decreased by 51.74%, from 9,597 to 4,627 patients. Major reductions (relative to the baseline waiting list) were observed in Ophthalmology (69.40%), Urology (59.23%), and Orthopedics (58.59%). Mean waiting times (SD) decreased from 12.7 (7.72) to 7.2 (4.75) months (p = 0.014), corresponding to a 158-day reduction. Mean monthly caseload in the main operating theatres (MOT) increased from 1,469 (139.3) cases in 2023 to 1,608 (94.4) in 2024 (p < 0.001).ConclusionA centralized, EPR-integrated surgical waiting list system significantly reduced surgical backlogs and delays, while improving coordination, prioritization, and theatre utilization. Differences in outcomes across departments reflect varying case complexities and highlight the need for tailored strategies. This scalable model supports more efficient post-pandemic recovery and long-term service resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.