Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42083977›Full record

ArticleThe Australasian journal of dermatology2026

Demographic Analysis of the Sun Protective Behaviours and Skin Cancer Risk of Victorian Farmers.

Eloise Violet Kwan, Jessie Adams, Joanna Macdonald, Susan Brumby, Tracey Hatherell, Feby Savira, Alison Kennedy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Australasian journal of dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eloise Violet KwanSt Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6687-4531
Jessie AdamsNational Centre for Farmer Health, Hamilton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1553-2942
Joanna MacdonaldNational Centre for Farmer Health, Hamilton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1062-9219
Susan BrumbySchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6332-3374
Tracey HatherellNational Centre for Farmer Health, Hamilton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2975-2612
Feby SaviraDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0383-812X
Alison KennedyNational Centre for Farmer Health, Hamilton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4450-8434

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFarmers have an elevated risk of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer due to their occupational exposure to high levels of ultraviolet radiation. The sun protective behaviours of farmers are poorly understood, limiting targeted interventions to this at-risk population.

objectivesThis study aimed to characterise sun protective behaviours among Victorian farmers and to assess whether demographic factors were associated with variations in sun protection uptake.

methodA cross-sectional study of 124 Victorian farmers was completed using Health and Lifestyle Assessment data collected by the National Centre for Farmer Health. Associations between sun protective behaviours (sunscreen, sunglasses, long sleeve shirt, long trousers, broad brim hat) and demographic factors (gender, age group, rurality) were investigated with descriptive statistics and ordinal logistic regression.

resultsAge group was significantly associated with sunscreen use (p = 0.035). Participants aged 65 years and over were most likely to never use sunscreen, while those aged 50-64 years were most likely to always use it. No significant associations were found between gender or rurality and any sun protective behaviour. Overall, use of sun protection was suboptimal across all demographic groups.

conclusionThese findings suggest that Victorian farmers over 65 years of age may benefit from targeted public health messaging and education from primary care physicians and dermatologists. Further research is required to validate these results given the small sample size. A focus group of at-risk farmers as identified in this study may be valuable to identify interventions that could increase the sun protective behaviours of Australian farmers.

Indexed as

FarmersHealth BehaviorSkin NeoplasmsSunscreening AgentsAdultAgedAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational ExposureProtective ClothingRisk FactorsVictoriaSunscreening Agentsfarmersmelanomarural healthskin neoplasmultraviolet rays

Identifiers

PMID42083977
PMCPMC13456189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.