ReviewObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2026
GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Weight Loss: A Critical Review of Mechanisms.
Review in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
GLP-1 receptor agonist medications have the potential to promote marked weight loss, but maximal and sustained benefit may be compromised by poor compliance and cessation of use. Development of next-generation medications that address current obstacles to effective use and development of effective adjunct treatments will benefit from better characterization of their mechanisms of action. This narrative review critically assesses eight purported mechanisms including modulation of appetite, chemosensory function, cravings/aversions, food noise, gastric emptying, the microbiome, incretin activity, and energy expenditure. Current evidence does not support a single dominant mechanism; a combination of subtle effects may underlie the efficacy of these medications. However, as experience with these medications and methods to assess their effects grows, it should be possible to better determine the relative importance of these and possibly other mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.