ArticleNursing open2026
The Experiences and Perspective of Partners of Men With Prostate Cancer in Ireland: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.
Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProstate cancer significantly impacts not only the individuals diagnosed but also their partners, who frequently undertake extensive caregiving responsibilities. Despite their crucial role, the experiences and needs of partners remain underrepresented in cancer care literature and policy, particularly in Ireland.
methodsA qualitative descriptive study exploring the lived experiences of nine partners of men with prostate cancer in Ireland was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in person, by phone, or virtually. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis, supported by NVivo software, and interpreted through Meleis' Transition Theory.
resultsFive major themes emerged: (1) Invisible Needs: Experience in Care, (2) Alone Together: Missing Couple-Centred Support, (3) Knowledge Deficit and Under preparedness, (4) Hesitancy, Silence and Emotional Restraints and (5) The Cost of Caring: Strain, Self-Care and Advocacy. Participants highlighted critical issues of marginalisation, emotional burden, under preparedness, and lack of inclusion for a specific group within a normal conventional care setting, which are precisely the experiences that need to be understood and addressed, not dismissed as representing a minority.
conclusionPartners of men with prostate cancer, especially those from LGBTQ+ communities, face significant psychosocial challenges that are often overlooked by the healthcare system. Findings underscore the urgent need for inclusive, couple-centred support models and tailored educational interventions. Enhancing caregiver involvement and wellbeing through systemic and policy-level changes could improve outcomes for both patients and their partners. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT STATEMENT: Patients and members of the public were not involved in the design or conduct of this research. Although participants contributed their perspectives as part of the qualitative study, there was no formal PPI in shaping the research process. The authors recognise the importance of involving patients and the public in co-designing research and will consider this in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.