ArticleCureus2026
Hybrid Planning for Complex Brain Metastases in Linear Accelerator (LINAC)-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Dosimetric Comparison With Dynamic Conformal Arc (DCA) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) Techniques.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDynamic conformal arc (DCA) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) are widely used for linear accelerator-based single-isocenter multi-target stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in treating multiple brain metastases. DCA offers advantages in delivery efficiency, quality assurance, and dose gradient steepness. However, DCA produces suboptimal conformity for challenging targets, including large postoperative cavities, irregularly shaped lesions, or tumors adjacent to critical organs-at-risk (OARs). VMAT improves conformity for complex targets but may be unnecessary for simple lesions within the same treatment plan. BrainLAB, Munich, Germany, recently developed a hybrid planning technique that applies VMAT arcs to one challenging lesion while using DCA for the remaining targets within a single plan. METHODOLOGY: Ten patients with 73 planning target volumes (PTVs) were retrospectively replanned using four techniques: DCA, Hybrid (BrainLAB Elements, v4.0), Varian RapidArc® (RA), and HyperArc (HA). Dosimetric endpoints included the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) conformity index (CI), Paddick conformity index (PCI), gradient index (GI), normal brain volume exposures (V23-V5 Gy), and maximum doses to critical organs at risk (OARs). Efficiency metrics included monitor units and beam-on time.
resultsAll techniques achieved ≥95% PTV coverage. VMAT-based plans (RA, HA) demonstrated superior conformity (median CI 1.03-1.11, PCI 0.85-0.90) compared with DCA (CI 1.41, PCI 0.68). Hybrid planning (CI 1.40, PCI 0.71) improved overall conformity versus DCA and achieved VMAT-like performance for VMAT-applied targets (CI 1.07, PCI 0.89). DCA exhibited the lowest GI; Hybrid maintained the low GI for VMAT-applied targets, while improving conformity. HA minimized normal brain exposure, while RA produced highest V5-V8 Gy. Hybrid resembled DCA in high-dose volumes while avoiding RA's extensive low-dose exposure. OAR maximum doses showed no significant differences. Hybrid had the longest beam-on time due to additional arcs.
conclusionsHybrid planning enhances conformity for challenging targets while preserving favorable DCA characteristics for remaining lesions. Despite longer beam-on times, Hybrid offers a practical solution for single-isocenter multi-target SRS cases involving irregular cavities or OAR-adjacent lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.