ArticleCureus2026
Olecranon Fractures: Patterns, Fixation Types, and Outcomes.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProminent metalwork remains a common source of postoperative discomfort following fixation of olecranon fractures and often leads to elective implant removal despite successful union. This study aimed to assess the incidence and pattern of symptomatic hardware prominence among different fixation methods involving tension band wiring (TBW), plate fixation, and suture constructs in a tertiary trauma center.
methodsA retrospective review was conducted of adult patients who underwent operative fixation for olecranon fractures at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, between January 2021 and July 2025. Patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 weeks were included. Both open and closed fractures were analyzed. Fixation methods included TBW, plate fixation using pre-contoured or hook plates, and high-strength fiber-suture constructs. The primary outcome was the reoperation rate, along with other fixation-related complications. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant.
resultsOf the 95 patients, 62 met the inclusion criteria (30 males, 32 females; mean age 57 years). The mean follow-up was 46 weeks (range, 3-42 months). TBW was used in 11 cases, plate fixation in 46, and suture fixation in five. A total of 22 patients experienced complications, of which 15 were due to prominent metalwork. Other complications requiring surgery included nonunion (1), synostosis (1), muscle hernia (1), and revision of radial head replacement (1). Three patients with loss of reduction did not undergo further surgery due to subsequent functional improvement. Sixteen patients had open fractures, with no postoperative infections noted. Of the 15 patients with prominent metalwork, 11 underwent implant removal (three in the TBW group and eight in the plating group). There was a difference in the incidence of removal of symptomatic metalwork between TBW (3/11, 27%) and plating (8/46, 17%), although the overall rate of symptomatic metalwork was similar in both groups (27% vs. 26%, respectively).
conclusionWhile both TBW and plate fixation provide stable fixation and reliable union, prominent metalwork remains a frequent postoperative issue and the primary reason for secondary surgery. Careful implant selection, meticulous soft‑tissue handling, and patient counseling are essential to minimize postoperative discomfort and optimize outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.