ArticleCureus2026
Conservative Treatment of Spontaneous Spinal Epidural Hematoma: A Report of Two Cases With Severe Neurologic Deficits and a Literature Review.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma (SSEH) is a rare but potentially devastating cause of acute spinal cord compression. Urgent surgical decompression is generally recommended, particularly in patients with severe neurological deficits. However, an increasing number of reports describe conservative management in patients with mild neurological deficits or spontaneous recovery. We present two cases of cervical SSEH that presented with severe neurological deficits (American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) B) and were managed conservatively after early spontaneous neurological improvement. In addition, a review of the literature was performed, focusing on prognostic factors and the role of conservative treatment. Both patients experienced rapid neurological improvement shortly after presentation and achieved complete functional recovery without surgical intervention. Follow-up MRI confirmed complete resolution of the epidural hematoma without evidence of spinal cord injury or underlying pathology. Literature review suggests that patients with mild neurologic deficits or early neurological improvement are candidates for conservative treatment. While urgent surgical decompression remains the standard of care for SSEH with severe or progressive neurological deficits, conservative management may be a safe and effective alternative in patients demonstrating early spontaneous neurological recovery, even in cases with initial severe neurological deficits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.