ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2026
Therapeutic Effects of Capacitive and Resistive Monopolar Radiofrequency on Muscle Stiffness and Local Hemodynamics of the Rectus Femoris: A Randomized Crossover Study of Female University Soccer Players.
Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Capacitive resistive monopolar radiofrequency (CRMF) improves muscle extensibility and local tissue oxygen saturation in the trunk region. However, its effects on the lower extremities, particularly the rectus femoris, remain unclear. Purpose: To examine the immediate effects of 448-kHz CRMF on muscle stiffness and hemodynamics of the rectus femoris in female collegiate soccer players. Study Design: Randomized crossover study. Methods: Healthy female collegiate soccer players from a university team were recruited. Those with a history of thigh muscle injury or orthopedic disorders such as fractures within the previous year, any history of neurological or cardiac disease, and presence of a cardiac pacemaker were excluded. Each participant received three interventions (CRMF, hot pack, and sham) in randomized order with ≥2-day washout periods. Muscle stiffness (kPa) was assessed using shear wave elastography; hemodynamics (oxygenated hemoglobin [Oxy-Hb], deoxygenated hemoglobin [deOxy-Hb], total-Hb, and tissue oxygen saturation [StO₂]) were measured using near-infrared spectroscopy at depths of 1.5 and 3.0 cm. Measurements were performed at pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and 30 min post-intervention. Results: 18 female soccer players (mean age ± standard deviation, 20.2 ± 1.4 years) participated in and completed the study protocol. CRMF significantly reduced rectus femoris stiffness immediately post-intervention in the stretch position compared with hot pack (p < 0.001) and sham (p = 0.006). In the resting position, stiffness did not differ significantly across conditions. At 3 cm depth, CRMF and hot pack significantly increased Oxy-Hb immediately compared with sham (p = 0.008 and 0.025, respectively). CRMF also exhibited higher total-Hb at 3 cm immediately (p = 0.028). StO₂ at 3 cm was higher with CRMF than with the hot pack immediately (p = 0.002) and sham at 30 min (p = 0.030). Conclusions: CRMF reduced rectus femoris muscle stiffness in the stretched position and increased deep-tissue Oxy-Hb, total-Hb, and StO₂ in female collegiate soccer players. Effects were immediate, and some hemodynamic responses persisted up to 30 min, suggesting that CRMF may be an effective thermotherapy for improving deep-tissue oxygenation and reducing muscle stiffness in sports and rehabilitation settings. Level of Evidence: 2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.