ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2026
Intra-Session Reliability of Eccentric Countermovement Jump Kinetics in Individuals Six Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neuromuscular impairments, including reduced eccentric force capacity and persistent limb asymmetries, are commonly observed after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), even during later stages of rehabilitation. Eccentric-phase countermovement jump (CMJ) metrics derived from force plates are increasingly used to monitor neuromuscular recovery after ACLR; however, the intra-session reliability of these eccentric variables in individuals after ACLR remains insufficiently described. Purpose: To evaluate the intra-session reliability and variability of selected eccentric-phase CMJ variables in physically active individuals six months after ACLR. Study Design: Crossectional reliability study. Methods: Eighty physically active participants were assessed six months after ACLR. Intra-session reliability was evaluated using three CMJ trials performed within a single testing session on dual force plates. Eccentric-phase variables were calculated separately for the operated (OP) and non-operated (NOP) limbs: Eccentric Peak Force (EPF), defined as the peak vertical ground reaction force during the braking phase; Eccentric Impulse (EI), defined as the impulse from bodyweight threshold to the instant of zero center-of-mass velocity; and eccentric Rate of Force Development (RFD), defined as the slope of force development over the first 200 ms after exceeding bodyweight. Intra-session reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 3,1) and standard error of measurement (SEM). Measurement variability was evaluated using the coefficient of variation (CV). Results: EPF demonstrated good intra-session reliability for both limbs (ICC = 0.868 [OP], 0.895 [NOP]) with acceptable variability (CV = 7.8% [OP], 6.4% [NOP]). EI also showed good reliability (ICC = 0.868 [OP], 0.840 [NOP]; SEM = 4.3 N·s [OP] and 6.2 N·s [NOP]), although variability was higher (CV = 10.2% [OP], 11.3% [NOP]). Eccentric RFD demonstrated moderate reliability (ICC = 0.620 [OP], 0.715 [NOP]) and high variability (CV = 30.1% [OP], 22.4% [NOP]; SEM = 217 N·s⁻¹ [OP] and 184 N·s⁻¹, [NOP]). Between-limb differences are reported descriptively and were not a primary outcome of the study. Conclusion: In individuals assessed six months after ACLR, eccentric CMJ-derived EPF and EI demonstrated acceptable intra-session relative reliability, whereas eccentric RFD showed lower reliability and greater variability. These findings indicate that EPF and EI may provide more consistent intra-session measurements than eccentric RFD when assessing eccentric-phase CMJ performance after ACLR. Results should be interpreted within the context of a single-session reliability design. Level of Evidence: 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.