Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42083483›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2026

In uncharted territory: managing the COVID-19 pandemic in Swedish regions and municipalities from a primary health care perspective.

Ingmarie Skoglund, Silje Rebekka Heltveit-Olsen, Anja Maria Brænd, Guro H Fossum, Jørund Straand, Sofia Sundvall, Mette Bech Risør, Pär-Daniel Sundvall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ingmarie SkoglundGeneral Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2544-4196
Silje Rebekka Heltveit-OlsenDepartment of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, The Antibiotic Centre for Primary Care, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8645-5836
Anja Maria BrændDepartment of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, The Antibiotic Centre for Primary Care, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0940-7555
Guro H FossumDepartment of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, The Antibiotic Centre for Primary Care, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3895-2280
Jørund StraandDepartment of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, General Practice Research Unit (AFE), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Sofia SundvallResearch, Education, Development & Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mette Bech RisørDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, The Research Unit for General Practice, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pär-Daniel SundvallGeneral Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore experiences and challenges faced by regional and municipal health care leaders during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on primary health care and care of older adults.

designA longitudinal qualitative study based on two rounds of semi-structured interviews 2-3 months apart. SETTING AND

participantsFifteen health care leaders strategically recruited from regions and municipalities across Sweden. The first interviews took place in November-December 2020, the second in January-March 2021.

resultsFour themes were identified. The first captured the challenge of navigating uncharted territory during an unprecedented crisis. The second addressed ethical dilemmas arising from public health priorities. The third highlighted the growing significance and evolving role of infection prevention and control. Finally, the fourth illustrated how initially productive and solution-oriented local collaboration and communication gradually gave way to tensions and conflicting responsibilities.

conclusionsIn the early phases of the pandemic, the Swedish Public Health Agency's leadership and measures were generally appreciated, although the initial response was widely perceived as slow and insufficient. The high mortality among older adults was regarded as a major failure, raising ethical concerns and exposing tensions in collaboration between actors. Pandemic work was experienced as exhausting yet meaningful, and the field of infection prevention and control gained increased recognition and status. Some distinctive features of Sweden's pandemic response - such as decentralised decision-making and an emphasis on individual responsibility - may have been shaped by the constitutional prohibition of ministerial rule and the substantial autonomy granted to regional and local authorities.

Indexed as

COVID-19Primary Health CareEthical DilemmasHumansLeadershipLongitudinal StudiesPandemicsPublic HealthQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2SwedenCOVID-19information managementorganization and administrationpandemicsprimary health carepublic healthqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID42083483
PMCPMC13148074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.