ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2026
In uncharted territory: managing the COVID-19 pandemic in Swedish regions and municipalities from a primary health care perspective.
Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore experiences and challenges faced by regional and municipal health care leaders during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on primary health care and care of older adults.
designA longitudinal qualitative study based on two rounds of semi-structured interviews 2-3 months apart. SETTING AND
participantsFifteen health care leaders strategically recruited from regions and municipalities across Sweden. The first interviews took place in November-December 2020, the second in January-March 2021.
resultsFour themes were identified. The first captured the challenge of navigating uncharted territory during an unprecedented crisis. The second addressed ethical dilemmas arising from public health priorities. The third highlighted the growing significance and evolving role of infection prevention and control. Finally, the fourth illustrated how initially productive and solution-oriented local collaboration and communication gradually gave way to tensions and conflicting responsibilities.
conclusionsIn the early phases of the pandemic, the Swedish Public Health Agency's leadership and measures were generally appreciated, although the initial response was widely perceived as slow and insufficient. The high mortality among older adults was regarded as a major failure, raising ethical concerns and exposing tensions in collaboration between actors. Pandemic work was experienced as exhausting yet meaningful, and the field of infection prevention and control gained increased recognition and status. Some distinctive features of Sweden's pandemic response - such as decentralised decision-making and an emphasis on individual responsibility - may have been shaped by the constitutional prohibition of ministerial rule and the substantial autonomy granted to regional and local authorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.