ArticleJournal of experimental botany2026
Evolutionarily conserved but not indispensable for survival: plastic UV RESISTANCE LOCUS8 functionality in Marchantia polymorpha under laboratory and field conditions.
Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolutionarily conserved but not indispensable for survival: plastic UV RESISTANCE LOCUS8 functionality in Marchantia polymorpha under laboratory and field conditions.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Article
- Diel Dynamics of Field Responses to UV and Photosynthetic Radiation in the Aquatic LiverwortPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The functionality of the UV-B photoreceptor UV RESISTANCE LOCUS8 (UVR8) has been widely demonstrated in angiosperms under controlled conditions, but studies in nature or using bryophytes are scarce. To fill this gap, we compared the UV responses of the model liverwort Marchantia polymorpha and a mutant lacking a functional UVR8, to provide for the first time an evolutionary perspective of UVR8 performance in both controlled and field conditions. Under exposure to UV in the laboratory, UVR8 in wild type plants was essential to induce the expression of genes (CHS1, FNSI, HY5, SIG5, and ELIP2) and the accumulation of metabolites (apigenin and luteolin derivatives, particularly apigenin 7-O-glucuronide) that contributed to conserving photosynthetic performance. In the mutant, gene and metabolite responses were much weaker, occurred only under high UV-B in a UVR8-independent response, and did not confer photoprotection to the photosynthetic apparatus. In a field seasonal cycle, differences between UV treatments and genotypes were attenuated and the UVR8 functionality was less clear, probably due to the low UV-B levels required to trigger plant responses and the interaction of other abiotic factors. Given the similarity of UVR8 functionality in M. polymorpha and Arabidopsis under both controlled and field conditions, we conclude that UVR8 has been conserved across plant evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.