Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42083453›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of school health2026

Framework of Core Competencies for Interdisciplinary School Mental Health Collaboration.

Rawn Boulden, Sarah Henry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of school health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rawn BouldenNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7875-9725
Sarah HenryVirginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchool mental health professionals (SMHPs) address complex student needs, yet collaboration is often hindered by role ambiguity, inconsistent preparation, and lack of consensus-based competencies. This study identified core competencies for effective interdisciplinary collaboration in K-12 schools.

methodsA three-round Delphi study involved 47 SMHPs, including school counselors, psychologists, social workers, and therapists. Panelists rated and refined competencies, which were then synthesized using a multi-step qualitative analysis into higher-order domains.

resultsConsensus was reached on 151 competencies across four themes: (1) effective communication and relationship-building, (2) collaborative leadership and team functioning, (3) professionalism, reflective practice, and critical thinking, and (4) cultural competence, equity, and a student-centered mindset. Each domain emphasized interpersonal and structural mechanisms supporting coordinated, student-focused collaboration. IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOL HEALTH POLICY, PRACTICE, AND EQUITY: The framework offers guidance for policy, training, and organizational structures. Embedding competencies into role expectations, professional development, and evaluation, alongside protected collaboration time and culturally responsive practices, can strengthen teams and promote equity.

conclusionsThis practitioner-informed, consensus-based framework provides a foundation for preparing SMHPs, guiding practice, and shaping policy to support coordinated, equitable mental health services in K-12 schools.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorInterdisciplinary CommunicationProfessional CompetenceSchool Health ServicesSchool Mental Health ServicesChildCultural CompetencyDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansLeadershipPsychologistscompetenciesinterdisciplinary collaborationschool mental health

Identifiers

PMID42083453
PMCPMC13139786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.