SynthesisJournal of adolescence2026
Nature-Based and Community-Level Responses to Climate Distress in Young People: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of adolescence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionClimate change is both an environmental crisis and a growing source of psychological distress for young people, calling for responses that nurture emotional resilience and collective engagement. The emerging response to climate distress has mainly focused on formal psychological and individual-level interventions. However, there is growing recognition that climate distress is shaped by collective, social, and structural conditions, and therefore may also require programs that extend beyond the individual.
methodsThe aim of this systematic review was to examine how nature-based and community-level programs support young people experiencing climate distress. A systematic search and synthesis of creative, educational, action-based, and nature-focused interventions yielded 11 records, each reporting on distinct interventions. Across studies, participant ages fell within the eligible range of 12-25 years. Programs were conducted in Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States, and globally. Gender was variably reported across studies.
resultsFindings revealed that programs had the most perceived effectiveness when they enabled emotional expression, community connection, and direct engagement with nature. These experiences were reported to transform feelings of isolation and helplessness into belonging, meaning, and agency.
conclusionsA narrative synthesis of the findings revealed five potential recommendations for future nature-based and community-level programs: (i) integrate creative expression, (ii) strengthen community connection, (iii) ground programs in nature, (iv) embed cultural relevance, and (v) build pathways to collective action. Applying these recommendations may enhance the sustainability and impact of future programs and help reduce climate distress among young people through strengthened resilience and shared purpose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.