Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42083265›Full record

ReviewCancer medicine2026

The Immune Landscape of Acral Melanoma: From Basic to Clinical.

Lihong Jiang, Zhaotian Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lihong JiangCancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education), The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7075-4889
Zhaotian ZhangCancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education), The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcral melanoma (AM) is an aggressive melanoma subtype with poor prognosis and limited response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Despite increasing research efforts, the mechanisms underlying therapeutic resistance remain incompletely understood.

aimThis review examines the mechanisms driving immunotherapy resistance in AM, summarizes current clinical advances in combination regimens, and explores future therapeutic directions.

methodsA narrative review of recent literature was undertaken, encompassing studies on resistance mechanisms and clinical trials investigating novel ICI-based combination therapies for AM.

resultsAM exhibits distinct immunosuppressive microenvironment characterized by low tumor mutational burden, reduced CD8+ T-cell infiltration, enrichment of regulatory T cells, and specific genetic alterations. Emerging clinical data demonstrate that combination regimens-particularly dual ICIs (anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4) and ICI combinations with anti-angiogenic agents or chemotherapy-have shown promising efficacy, with some achieving superior response rates in AM patients. DISCUSSION: Understanding resistance mechanisms is critical for identifying novel therapeutic targets and optimizing personalized strategies. Current evidence suggests combination therapies may overcome resistance and improve outcomes, though optimal regimens and sequencing require further investigation.

conclusionContinued research into innovative combination approaches and predictive biomarkers is urgently needed to improve survival in AM.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansImmunotherapyTumor MicroenvironmentImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsacral melanomacombination regimendrug resistanceimmune checkpointimmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID42083265
PMCPMC13139625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.