Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42083151›Full record

Trial reportTransplantation2026

Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Fixed-dose, Subcutaneous, and Intravenous Administration of VEL-101, an Anti-CD28 PEGylated Monoclonal Antibody Fragment, in Healthy Participants: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose Escalation, Phase 1 Study.

Simon Tremblay, Ana Abaigar, Pamela Allton, Duarte Sardinha, Samir J Patel, Kamal Shah, James Maynard, Babatunde Otulana

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Trial report in Transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05238493 (A Phase 1, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Dose Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of VEL-101 Administered Intravenously or Subcutaneously in Healthy Subjects.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05238493 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase 1, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Dose Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of VEL-101 Administered Intravenously or Subcutaneously in Healthy Subjects.

TypeinterventionalSponsorVeloxis PharmaceuticalsRan2022 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsHealthy VolunteersArmsVEL-101, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Simon TremblayClinical Development, Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Cary, NC.
Ana AbaigarModel Informed Development, CTI Clinical Trial & Consulting Services, Bilbao, Spain.
Pamela AlltonClinical Operations, Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Cary, NC.
Duarte SardinhaClinical Operations, Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Cary, NC.
Samir J PatelMedical Affairs, Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Cary, NC.
Kamal ShahPharmacovigilance, Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Cary, NC.
James MaynardMedical Affairs, CTI Clinical Trial & Consulting Services, Cincinnati, OH.
Babatunde OtulanaResearch and Development, Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Cary, NC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVEL-101, also known as pegrizeprument, is a monovalent, humanized, anti-CD28 PEGylated monoclonal antibody fragment that selectively blocks CD28 costimulation, under development as a maintenance immunosuppressant in kidney transplant recipients. In development as a fixed-dose subcutaneous maintenance immunosuppressant in kidney transplant recipients, the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single ascending doses of VEL-101 were evaluated in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose escalation, phase 1 study (NCT05238493).

methodsSixty healthy participants were randomly assigned 3:1 to receive 1 of 7 dose levels of VEL-101 or placebo (2 intravenous and 5 subcutaneous) and followed for 50 d. Safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic analyses evaluated the nature and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events, serum VEL-101 levels, and CD28 receptor occupancy, respectively.

resultsMost adverse events were mild to moderate, with injection site pain the most frequently reported. One serious adverse event (rhabdomyolysis, grade 3) resolved with supportive care. No case of clinically elevated cytokines or cytokine release syndrome was observed. Following subcutaneous administration, all participants had detectable serum concentrations of VEL-101. Dose-exposure proportionality was maintained, and VEL-101 elimination was consistent regardless of subcutaneous or intravenous administration.

conclusionsSubcutaneous administration of VEL-101 resulted in dose-proportional increases in maximum concentration and area under the time-concentration curve 0-inf across the doses tested and a sustained receptor occupancy of ≥50% to ≥80%. Subcutaneous administration of VEL-101 was generally well-tolerated, yielding detectable CD28 receptor occupancy levels acceptable for future study in kidney transplant recipients.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCD28 AntigensImmunosuppressive AgentsPolyethylene GlycolsAdultDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCD28 AntigensImmunosuppressive AgentsPolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID42083151
PMCPMC13182799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.